I've just received the following two emails:
From: Blogger
To: blah
Subject: Your post titled 'Take that, Ms Harman!' has been deleted
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 12:15:45 +0000
Hello,
As you may know, our community guidelines
(https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy) describe the boundaries for what we
allow – and don't allow – on Blogger. Your post titled ‘Take that, Ms
Harman!’ was flagged to us for review. We have determined that it violates
our guidelines and deleted the post, previously at
http://markwadsworth.blogspot.com/2011/10/take-that-ms-harman.html.
Why was your blog post deleted?
Your content has violated our Illegal activities policy. Please follow
the community guidelines link in this email to learn more.
If you wish to request a review of the post, click the following link:
https://www.blogger.com/go/appeal-post?blogId=1141932539860553199&postId=2949364971607555706.
This will trigger a review of the post.
We encourage you to review the full content of your blog posts to make
sure that they are in line with our standards, as additional violations
could result in termination of your blog.
For more information, please review the following resources:
Terms of Service: https://www.blogger.com/go/terms
Blogger community guidelines: https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy
Yours sincerely,
The Blogger Team
and
From: Blogger
To: blah
Subject: Your post entitled 'Nuts Magazine' has been put behind a warning for readers
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 11:03:54 +0000
Hello,
As you may know, our community guidelines
(https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy) describe the boundaries for what we
allow – and don't allow – on Blogger. Your post titled 'Nuts Magazine' was
flagged to us for review. This post was put behind a warning for readers
because it contains sensitive content; the post is visible at
http://markwadsworth.blogspot.com/2014/04/nuts-magazine.html. Your blog
readers must acknowledge the warning before being able to read the
post/blog.
Why was your blog post put behind a warning for readers?
Your content has been evaluated according to our adult content policy.
Please follow the community guidelines link in this email to learn more.
We apply warning messages to posts that contain sensitive content. If
you are interested in having the status reviewed, please update the content
to adhere to Blogger's community guidelines. Once the content is updated,
you may republish it at
https://www.blogger.com/go/appeal-post?blogId=1141932539860553199&postId=443624183410766575.
This will trigger a review of the post.
For more information, please review the following resources:
Terms of Service: https://www.blogger.com/go/terms
Blogger community guidelines: https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy
Yours sincerely,
The Blogger Team
Have we been hacked? Does anyone know what is going on?
Labour news: Christmas bumper edition
4 hours ago
15 comments:
Don't take this as gospel, but it doesn't seem to be a hack. I had one and it seems to come from a compliance review of old blog posts. I'm not sure exactly what triggers the actions they take though.
Warning.
This post may contain nuts.
There, sorted.
As for the other one, that item is commonly referred to as M. Harperson.
Missgendering is a serious offence.
Blogger.com is a participant of the Globalist/Communist coup against America. Therefore; your post has been censored; as it is in opposition to their narrative. Blogger.com has been tagged for destruction in the upcoming purge of criminal online organizations.Please plan accordingly; by researching alternative platforms; by which you may post on without interference.
What did you post? Can you copy and paste it in these comments?
This has been going on on YouTube for ages. They are both owned by Google. The popularity of YouTube with children is probably the main driver behind YouTube censorship, rather than any global conspiracy. It looks like they may be harmonising their policies across all their platforms.
"What did you post? Can you copy and paste it in these comments?"
I didn't post anything. I've just had another email about another post. On further examination, it looks like they are old posts of Mark's, so this is retrospective censorship.
Bayard. Ah. I bet it's his stuff on the CO2 nonsense. They definitely won't like those.
"As for the other one, that item is commonly referred to as M. Harperson."
No, that is no good. "Harperson" could be construed as referring to the son of a harper. I suggest "Harbeing". That is neither sexist, racist nor speciesist.
B
Or, 'Dear M Har**** (please complete the blanks as your gender preference)'.
How do you pronounce "M", "mmm"?
B
Typo. Ms.
L, there I was, thinking you were being woke and non-gender-specific, like M. Doonhamer above. Mind you, I always pronounce "M" as "M'sieur".
Woke? Moi? Quelle horreur mon petty shoe
Bane of our life, yes.
I had several of these, and requested a review. They sorted it out.
Post a Comment