Tuesday, 21 March 2023

Censorship

I've just received the following two emails:

From: Blogger
To: blah
Subject: Your post titled 'Take that, Ms Harman!' has been deleted
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 12:15:45 +0000

Hello,
As you may know, our community guidelines (https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy) describe the boundaries for what we allow – and don't allow – on Blogger. Your post titled ‘Take that, Ms Harman!’ was flagged to us for review. We have determined that it violates our guidelines and deleted the post, previously at http://markwadsworth.blogspot.com/2011/10/take-that-ms-harman.html.

Why was your blog post deleted? Your content has violated our Illegal activities policy. Please follow the community guidelines link in this email to learn more.

If you wish to request a review of the post, click the following link: https://www.blogger.com/go/appeal-post?blogId=1141932539860553199&postId=2949364971607555706. This will trigger a review of the post.

We encourage you to review the full content of your blog posts to make sure that they are in line with our standards, as additional violations could result in termination of your blog.

For more information, please review the following resources: Terms of Service: https://www.blogger.com/go/terms Blogger community guidelines: https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy

Yours sincerely,
The Blogger Team

and

From: Blogger
To: blah
Subject: Your post entitled 'Nuts Magazine' has been put behind a warning for readers
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 11:03:54 +0000

Hello,
As you may know, our community guidelines (https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy) describe the boundaries for what we allow – and don't allow – on Blogger. Your post titled 'Nuts Magazine' was flagged to us for review. This post was put behind a warning for readers because it contains sensitive content; the post is visible at http://markwadsworth.blogspot.com/2014/04/nuts-magazine.html. Your blog readers must acknowledge the warning before being able to read the post/blog.

Why was your blog post put behind a warning for readers? Your content has been evaluated according to our adult content policy. Please follow the community guidelines link in this email to learn more.

We apply warning messages to posts that contain sensitive content. If you are interested in having the status reviewed, please update the content to adhere to Blogger's community guidelines. Once the content is updated, you may republish it at https://www.blogger.com/go/appeal-post?blogId=1141932539860553199&postId=443624183410766575. This will trigger a review of the post.

For more information, please review the following resources: Terms of Service: https://www.blogger.com/go/terms Blogger community guidelines: https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy

Yours sincerely,
The Blogger Team

Have we been hacked? Does anyone know what is going on?

15 comments:

A K Haart said...

Don't take this as gospel, but it doesn't seem to be a hack. I had one and it seems to come from a compliance review of old blog posts. I'm not sure exactly what triggers the actions they take though.

Doonhamer said...

Warning.
This post may contain nuts.
There, sorted.
As for the other one, that item is commonly referred to as M. Harperson.
Missgendering is a serious offence.

BigJymn said...

Blogger.com is a participant of the Globalist/Communist coup against America. Therefore; your post has been censored; as it is in opposition to their narrative. Blogger.com has been tagged for destruction in the upcoming purge of criminal online organizations.Please plan accordingly; by researching alternative platforms; by which you may post on without interference.

Lola said...

What did you post? Can you copy and paste it in these comments?

Rich Tee said...

This has been going on on YouTube for ages. They are both owned by Google. The popularity of YouTube with children is probably the main driver behind YouTube censorship, rather than any global conspiracy. It looks like they may be harmonising their policies across all their platforms.

Bayard said...

"What did you post? Can you copy and paste it in these comments?"

I didn't post anything. I've just had another email about another post. On further examination, it looks like they are old posts of Mark's, so this is retrospective censorship.

Lola said...

Bayard. Ah. I bet it's his stuff on the CO2 nonsense. They definitely won't like those.

Bayard said...

"As for the other one, that item is commonly referred to as M. Harperson."

No, that is no good. "Harperson" could be construed as referring to the son of a harper. I suggest "Harbeing". That is neither sexist, racist nor speciesist.

Lola said...

B

Or, 'Dear M Har**** (please complete the blanks as your gender preference)'.

Bayard said...

How do you pronounce "M", "mmm"?

Lola said...

B
Typo. Ms.

Bayard said...

L, there I was, thinking you were being woke and non-gender-specific, like M. Doonhamer above. Mind you, I always pronounce "M" as "M'sieur".

Lola said...

Woke? Moi? Quelle horreur mon petty shoe

James Higham said...

Bane of our life, yes.

JuliaM said...

I had several of these, and requested a review. They sorted it out.