Tuesday 17 August 2010

Readers' Letters Of The Day

From The Evening Standard (I can't find this online):

My respects to Winnie Langley's family, but I dispute her title as Britain's oldest smoker. My grandmother, Esther Zietman, is coming up to 103 in December and has smoked since she was 13. At 99, she asked her doctor about giving up and he advised against it, saying that to do so would kill her.

Clive Zietman


A potted history of the next ten years from the FT:

... for so long people have sneered at the Japanese for their inability to steer their economy to recovery. Perhaps because they have sneered so much, it is no longer possible to admit that after a huge housing bubble bursts, there is nothing to do except suffer many years of economic indignity.

The fixation with Japan was not helpful during Mr Greenspan’s watch, nor I fear will it be of much use this time. The Japanese may be different, but they were not stupid.

Takashi Ito, Tokyo, Japan


And, the slightly longer summary of how we got here from The Metro:

Aran tells us we need to reform the international finance system to fund the vision of risk-taking entrepreneurs, but how many of those making millions in bankers' bonuses are doing just that?

Much of the 'wealth' supposedly created by the financial system in recent years has been mortgage debt. The more people borrowed because they were scared of being left off the property ladder, the more house prices rose and the more money (but really debt) was used to pay for it.

There is no real entrepreneurial wealth creation in this vicious circle. It has brought the country to its knees, not just because of the misery of those forced out of decent housing by high prices, but also the stress caused by borrowing too much and the resultant economic crash as the boom turned to bust. The only people who profit are those who are so wealthy they don't need a mortgage, or those who oil the wheels of the system and take their cut.

Matthew Huntbach, via e-mail.

5 comments:

Lola said...

A lot of the people seem to 'get' it, don't they? So why don't the politicians and the bankers?

Mark Wadsworth said...

L, because they are busy getting elected by the Home-Owner-Ists, oiling the wheels and taking their cut :-)

Steven_L said...

You think people are starting to click on Lola?

I don't know very many people who 'get it', the people I know that don't 'get it' and still bang on about 'the property ladder' sure as hell outvote the people I know who do get it.

Mark Wadsworth said...

SL, indeed. The insane notion that an ever larger large banking sector and ever rising house prices are good for the economy is deeply engrained.

Bayard said...

"The only people who profit are those who are so wealthy they don't need a mortgage, or those who oil the wheels of the system and take their cut."

I'd disagree, the majority of those who have no mortgage (and they don't necessarily have to be wealthy) are merely unaffected by the bubble, they don't benefit from it unless they sell up and buy somewhere smaller or rent.

Only the banks and those in the financial services sector who depend on them actually benefit. The vast majority of people caught up i the debt system are like long term addicts: the drug no longer has any effect, but they have to keep taking it for fear of the withdrawal symptoms.