Chuckles alerts me to two further incidents:
From News24.com: "Cape Town - A 14-year-old American tourist in South Africa during the World Cup plunged to his death from Table Mountain while hiking with his family, police said on Sunday... The family, who are from Texas, were vacationing in South Africa and intended to watch some World Cup matches, said Jones."
Hmm. That's pretty borderline. It ticks the boxes for "linked to the football World Cup" and "in South Africa", but I don't think that falling off a cliff counts as a "violent death" (in the criminal sense).
From Sport24.com: "Cape Town - A World Cup Regional Court on Thursday granted bail to two teenagers accused of a hit-and-run in Gordon's Bay in which an American tourist died and two people were seriously injured."
Again, that ticks the boxes for "violent deaths" and "in South Africa" but what would clinch it either way is whether the American tourist was there to watch the football or not.
Discuss.
Bonus round: someone who doesn't know their uvula from their vuvuzela.
Friday, 18 June 2010
Do either of these count?
My latest blogpost: Do either of these count?Tweet this! Posted by Mark Wadsworth at 10:33
Labels: crime, Football, South Africa
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
I reckon that they fail.
Yes the first one was falling off a mountain in SA, the reason for being there was to watch football.
But.
By the same argument, if someone was killed by a falling roof tile whilst walking to the shop, that would be a shopping-related death. Not in my book.
(On the other hand, if that shopper was carrying a can of beer it would obviously count as alcohol-related.)
It depends on whose principles we are using to define the deaths.
If we used the ASH "smoking related deaths theory" then it is every single violent death merely because the World Cup is on.
Using more sane principles then both are a fail.
CR
The second one refers to a 'World Cup Regional Court'. These are 50 or so special courts set up to expeditiously hear cases specifically related to the World Cup, which rather suggests that yes, they were in SA for the Cup.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/10349389.stm
And I'd describe falling down Table Mountain as pretty violent, just not violence by a third party. This is not some gentle rolling dale we are talking about.
This is the 'easy route' -
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_E7p8MjGti_o/SmGc36jhwsI/AAAAAAAADRQ/SWove1DvhU4/s1600/Platteklip-Gorge-Table-Mountain6.jpg
VFTS, CR, having considered your comments and Ch's further evidence, I suggest we count the first one as a 'fail' but the second one is added to the 'confirmed' list. Agreed?
".. whether the American tourist was there to watch the football or not": do England matches count as football?
D: "do England matches count as football?"
Not if we're playing cricket or rugby etc. Only if we're playing football.
And another -
http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=13&art_id=vn20100622042808615C193593
Post a Comment