I don't really have a problem with 2nd homes themselves. It's that home-owner-ism means that people who buy 2nd homes in rural idylls then try to prevent any new development in order to protect their house price.
You then end up with ridiculous solutions like covenants on a few houses for locals, rather than the simple solution of just bulldozing a few hundred acres and building a new housing estate.
Do you think Cameron reined in the 1922 Committee in order to slap down Redwood and his gang of blackguards attempting to subvert Cameron's recent interest, or acquiescence, in CG-taxing second homes?
JT, when have I ever said anything against second home ownership? What is the difference between one family + one big house and one family + two smaller houses? As you point out, it's the rampant NIMBYism that irks.
5 comments:
Being a bit thick this a.m. Can you explain?
I don't really have a problem with 2nd homes themselves. It's that home-owner-ism means that people who buy 2nd homes in rural idylls then try to prevent any new development in order to protect their house price.
You then end up with ridiculous solutions like covenants on a few houses for locals, rather than the simple solution of just bulldozing a few hundred acres and building a new housing estate.
Do you think Cameron reined in the
1922 Committee in order to slap down Redwood and his gang of blackguards attempting to subvert Cameron's recent interest, or acquiescence, in CG-taxing second homes?
JT, when have I ever said anything against second home ownership? What is the difference between one family + one big house and one family + two smaller houses? As you point out, it's the rampant NIMBYism that irks.
DBC, your guess is as good as.
No, I know. I'm just trying to put even more flesh on the LVT bones.
I'd also get rid of the Duchy of Cornwall and auction off the land. 600+ sq km allows plenty of house building.
Post a Comment