Tuesday 2 February 2010

Well duh...

From the CityAM:

Myners: 50pc tax rate won't raise much

THE government has "significantly reduced" the level of revenue it expects to generate from the new 50p income tax band, City minister Lord Myners admitted yesterday. In a tacit recognition that high earners will find ways to evade the higher rate of tax, Lord Myners said he was doubtful the Treasury would haul in the £1.1bn estimated for 2010 or the £2.5bn earmarked for 2011.

"We have made adjustments for the behavioural consequences of the new higher rate of taxation and have accordingly significantly reduced the anticipated tax take," he said during a Parliamentary debate. "But we still believe it will be beneficial."

The City minister's comments confirm warnings by the Institute for Fiscal Studies and accountants that the government's calculations of the amount an increased levy on people earning more than £150,000 will yield are inaccurate. Financial advisers say many of the two per cent of the population falling into the category will find ways to dodge the 50 per cent rate – either by pumping up this year's pay, storing up part of next year's salary in a company account or leaving the country.

Lord Myners said Labour's commitment to the 50p rate was not "ideological". It would be lowered as soon as economically possible, he added.


Even if they are right, and the 50p rate will raise £1bn or £2bn more from higher earners (a pittance compared to the £178bn projected budget deficit), it's still one heck of a gamble - the whole exercise may be well be revenue-negative in the medium term, seeing as a lot of high earners who move abroad might not come back; and those who were thinking of coming to the UK might be put off it even for years after the 50p rate has been scrapped again; and for every high earner, there is the associated coterie of receptionists, PR people, admin staff, butlers and chauffeurs, all off the dole queue, paying PAYE and spending their money in the shops etc.

1 comments:

Robin Smith said...

Yes but they want to win the election! Thinking that punishing the wealthy will keep the prolos happy.

They might do a lot better by introducing an LVT with the hint that this will fuck up the bankers, due to a collapse in their asset prices.

This would devastate the economy of course if done overnight. But they will bail out of any pre election plans if they win anyway. So what ?