From Ed Miliband's article in today's Evening Standard:
The people who want to deny or cast doubt on whether climate change is happening are the most dangerous. They want to tell people that we can stick our heads in the sand and the problem will go away.
Scientifically, they are the flat-earth brigade of the modern era. The scientific evidence from across the world shows we need to act. Here in the UK, the Met Office, the Natural Environment Research Council and the Royal Society are just some of the world-renowned scientific bodies who are united in their view...
*ahem*
Ed Miliband is part of the government.
The Met Office, formerly known as The Meteorological Office, is funded by the government.
The Natural Environment Research Council is a fairly new quango (new to me, at any rate), funded by the government (more specifically by the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills, see page 51 to their last accounts).
UPDATE: As Neil points out in the comments, it burns its way through over £400 million of taxpayers' finest every year, see page 39 of the accounts.
The Royal Society is funded by the government.
*/ahem*
PS Mr Ed is right on two things though: disposable nappies (especially Pampers) beat the old-fashioned terry ones hands down, you'd have to be certifiably insane to say otherwise, and it would be really good if other countries signed up to some agreement to reduce their CO2 emissions, because then the UK could steal a march on them by pressing on regardless.
PPS The photo that accompanied the article looked like this, and had the caption "Warning: the recent flooding in Cumbria could be a foretaste of what climate change could bring". It looks to me more like:
a) a miserable failure of town planning and/or
b) what happens if you don't dredge your rivers properly.
Friday, 4 December 2009
Friday Fun With Mister Ed
My latest blogpost: Friday Fun With Mister EdTweet this! Posted by Mark Wadsworth at 21:46
Labels: Ed Miliband, Global cooling, Quangocracy
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Nobody thought the earth was flat anyway.
The Met Office is a branch of the MOD, it is guarded by military policemen; Hadley/CRU is mostly funded by DEFRA.
This outburst by Brown and his pet Miliband will be a double own goal since who cares what they say anyway especially when mouthed with such clear vitriol.
Off to CO2pengate Gordon, let the Jonah Effect do its worst.
NERC (£400 million a year) was set up in the 60s but I suspect got the big money under Labour.Apart from what amounts to eco-fascist PR its only product is these 21 reports - many of them warming propaganda, though the one on aging in swifts may have scientific value. http://www.nerc.ac.uk/research/highlights/2009/
This does not seem a good return on the money.
Nerc was one of Prof Jones' £13.7 million funders. Its boss also challenged sceptics to a public debate in the Guardian a couple of years ago & when several accepted it went silent. It seems to almost entirely parasitic & should be chopped.
This is just nonsense.
Around the 4th century BC, Aristotle demonstrated that the earth was not flat. You can demonstrate to anyone, quickly that the earth is not flat (by showing them photos or testimonies of people travelling the earth or constellational positions, or by getting them to watch ships going over the horizon).
I doubt that anyone but a few handfuls of people can do the same thing with climate change. Can Ed Milliband, within a day or two, produce a proof that shows the sea level rises predicted in IPCC reports? Or George Monbiot? Or David Attenborough? I doubt it very much.
So, climate change is a matter of trust for most, and a weapon for the statists to wield to justify more government involvement.
The problem with the emails for the warmists is that it breaks, or casts doube on that trust.
If the warmists really want to make a case, they should quit the propaganda and actually start explaining the science (if they really have any).
On reflection, it seems like the AGW brigade are succeeding in pulling off a fairly major propaganda coup. They are getting the public to accept that "climate change" means "AGW". This allows them to fulminate against "flat earthers" who deny "climate change" and the public will believe they are attacking AGW sceptics. If pressed, they can quite reasonably say that no-one in their right mind would deny that the climate is changing.
I would like to mention that Marxism is analogous to economic creationism.
I may even do a post on the similarities.
It looks to me more like:
a) a miserable failure of town planning and/or
b) what happens if you don't dredge your rivers properly.
Precisely.
Post a Comment