Jumping H F***! What's it all about? The article ends - presumably completely accurately - as follows:
"The building has been described as having structural problems which do not meet today's requirements, but is said not to be unsafe to staff, patients or the public. A senior health official has said previously that there are only risks if the asbestos is disturbed"*.
OK, own up! Which local 'asbestos removal experts' have been paying backhanders?
* Which is what sensible people have been saying all along.
Forbidden Bible Verses — Genesis 43:24-34
10 hours ago
2 comments:
Thanks for the link. I don't use my real surname for blogging for privacy reasons.
I would be happy for you to use the name of my blog (Question That) as the link text rather than 'Ian', if you like.
The risk from the asbestos is probably far far less than the risk from the medics and nurses spreading germs.
Post a Comment