Yesterday I posted as follows
From The Evening Standard:
"Flybe owns about 6% of Gatwick's slots. Selling off some or all of these — to operators which could include easyJet, British Airways or Norwegian — could bring in, according to Liberum Capital's estimates, as much as £12.5 million."
I have no idea whether Flybe owns the best slot or the worst slots, but assuming a mix of both, that means the total value of the landing/take-off monopoly rights at Gatwick (after taxes etc) is around £200 million.
There was another interesting snippet in this morning's Metro:
Flybe is to sell all 25 of its runway slots at Gatwick airport to raise up to £20 million. The struggling regional airline saw its shares rise by 20 per cent on the new yesterday on hopes a deal can be found.
The only way to make sense of that is to assume that Flybe is making a loss from those slots but that analysts think that other airlines think that they will be able to use those slots profitably. Which might be e.g. because Flybe doesn't own tasty slots at the "other end".
The £20 million figure is a bit higher than the £12.5 million mentioned yesterday, fair enough. So the assumption is that those slots are worth between £500,000 and £800,000 each to an airline that can use them profitably.
Also worth noting is that one "slot" means the right to land and take off again at a fairly specified time each and every day of the year, i.e. 25 slots = 6% of all Gatwick slots, meaning that there are about 400 slots at Gatwick, call it one landing/take-off every minute and half for ten hours a day (or whatever).
We might as well turn that £500,000 - £800,000 per slot into an annualised value of £100,000 - £160,000 and divide it by 360 flights a year, which tells us that the anticipated super-profit (monopoly or rental income) per flight is only £300 or £400, call it £1 or £2 per passenger (the figure is depressed by APD). Or you could double the value of the slots for the "other end" and double the number of flights to arrive at the same figure, i.e. to fly from A to B and back again you need to control a slot at A and a slot at B.
Must stop scanning headlines
3 hours ago
2 comments:
Yup, that sounds about right (also implying the benefit BA gets is gbp10k a flight, which for a long-haul airline is about the difference between "profitable" and "bust" - average revenue for a longhaul widebody is in the region of gbp50-100k a flight).
Again, remember slots only have a financial value at congested airports and busy times of day - this will normally not be an issue at the provincial-non-metropolitan (they're based in Exeter) airports at the other end of Flybe's LGW routes.
So if you want to operate from LHR to JFK you'll have paid upfront the equivalent of gbp10-20k a flight for your slots (unless you're BA or AA and inherited them). If you want to operate from Southend to Inverness, then you'll be paying nothing. Flybe are far closer to the second end of the spectrum, so it's not too surprising that they're giving up at Gatwick.
JB, yup.
Some airports are so out of the way that they will pay airlines to land there - their calculation being that they can claw back a £10 per passenger subsidy because each passenger will spend more than that at the airport (or the people who come to pick him up will spend that much on parking charges).
Post a Comment