Friday 7 December 2012

How many Poor Widows In Mansions are there?

By Prof. Karen Rowlinson (pdf) of the University of Birmingham:

The Liberal Democrats are currently proposing to introduce a ‘mansion tax’ on properties worth over £2 million. This tax has also drawn criticism from the right and is not supported by their coalition partners in the Conservative party.

For example, in a pamphlet for the Centre for Policy Studies, Lucian Cook asks us to "consider the plight of the low-income widow whose family prudently saved for years to buy the property of their dreams. It is difficult to envisage a case in which forcing her out of that home, because of an inability to pay this new tax could be fair. And there are plenty of people in this category".

Once again, this produces more heat than light and there are actually very few people in this category. Indeed, only 4% of those who were retired in 2010 had both an income below the official poverty line* and housing equity over £100,000 - not anywhere close to a mansion tax level of £2m. Moreover, the Liberal Democrats have suggested that where there are any widows or widowers who might struggle with the tax they can roll it up and pay it when they die.

* below 60% of median income, equivalised for different household types.


As to "home of their dreams", this is yet more Homey DoubleSpeak. Aren't they also always wailing on about Poor Widows In Modest Homes which they bought decades ago in a normal sort of area for tuppence ha'penny (the notion of "prudently saving for years" is complete bollocks as well; by and large, the mortgage payments for ten or fifteen years until it was paid off were far, far less than what the rent would have been; effectively they got the house for free) and which are now worth millions?

So is that house a Modest House or The Home Of Their Dreams? The tax is largely on where the house is and not on the physical house itself.

15 comments:

Lola said...

Well, a 'modest house' can be the 'home of their dreams'. The fact that it has an inflated value because of HOI and bad money (and bonkers taxation) is as you say HomeOwneristic.

My house is 'modest'. But it's where I want them to carry me from in me box.

Lola said...

Thinking about it, perhaps I should have said 'market price', not 'value'.

Mark Wadsworth said...

L, selling prices fluctuate wildly, but rental values are fairly stable and we can assume they are very close to actual market value. And the more people are 'in the market' (including the freeholder) then the closer they will be.

So if PWIM bought a house which then had a rental value of tuppence ha'penny and it now has a rental value of £50,000, then she hasn't paid for £49,999.99 of it.

Bayard said...

I've never seen an actual PWIM trotted out by the press, so I assume they are as mythical as unicorns.

Mark Wadsworth said...

B, I don't doubt there are some, it might be tens or even hundreds of thousands, but only 1% of the population or something.

Bayard said...

In which case has the Daily Mail never cited "Mrs Smith, who has lived alone on her war-widow's pension in her four-storey house in Mayfair after her husband was killed defending Britain from the Nazi hordes, will be forced to sell her beloved home full of memorabilia of her war-hero husband" etc etc ad nauseam? I mean they always seem to find a family on £600 a week benefits, or an asylum seeker who has walked straight into a £200,000 home and is not paying any rent to imply that there are hundreds more like them (which there probably aren't).

Physiocrat said...

What dream property is there left for the elderly widow to contemplate? The thought is macabre but then one ought to be realistic.

Mark Wadsworth said...

B, there are a few.

The DM (or was it the Telegraoh?) once featured one, and I've received emails from PWIMs telling me I am a heartless bastard and so on.

The BBC did an article about the new higher council tax in Greece and had no trouble tracking down a couple of PWIMs in Athens.

Ph, tee hee.

Bayard said...

"The DM (or was it the Telegraoh?) once featured
one and I've received emails from PWIMs telling me I am a heartless bastard and so on."

You have to agree that's not very impressive. Here we have a major political creature on which taxation policy is partly based and one newspaper once featured one and, by the way, they found two in Greece. It reminds me of the Russian town where a traveller found everyone blamed everything that went wrong in the town on the Jews, despite the fact that the last Jew left in the C19th pogroms.

Mark Wadsworth said...

B: "Here we have a major political creature on which taxation policy is partly based"

Not "partly based", our tax and economic policies are totally entirely based on the interests of PWIMs. The notion that we could simply give them exemptions, discounts, deferments, some sort of means-tested benefit or higher pensions appears to be beyond the wit of mankind.

Bayard said...

Personally, I'd be inclined to refer to The PWIM (in the singular) in future, as she seems more important than The Queen.

john b said...

I suppose after Phil passes, the two may be one and the same - I'm not sure the Civil List would cover LVT on Her Maj's various properties... ;-)

Mark Wadsworth said...

B, JB, Buckingham Palace gardens are 40 acres, that's tip top prime central London. That would have a site only rental value, with planning, of about £150 million a year.

Physiocrat said...

Buck House gardens do not have planning permission for development and would not get it so what then is its rental value?

Mark Wadsworth said...

Phys, as a private garden with no planning, the rental value is perhaps "only" £20 million a year, surely there'd be some oligarch happy to pay £20 million a year to live there.