Sunday 15 April 2012

Oi! Fatties! You're next!

From the BBC:

Prof Stephenson told the BBC a campaign to persuade people to eat healthy food might work in the same way as the current anti-smoking drive. There have been heavy restrictions on advertising smoking in the UK, on TV and at sports events, and a consultation is being launched on whether cigarettes should be sold in plain packaging.

"It's much more likely, as in smoking, that the solution will lie in changing the environments, changing the way people are exposed to marketing, advertising and pressures to buy these kinds of foods," he said, "Another aspect of that is the taxation of cigarettes to deter people from buying them - that seems something we should look at in relation to food," he said.

However, Prof Stephenson said he did not think society could simply exercise its way out of the problem of obesity. "My own personal experience is you have to exercise a huge amount to lose weight, I would have to run on a treadmill at maximum speed for an hour to counter-effect the calories from one or two Mars bars. Most people in modern life just don't have the time in our lives to spend several hours a day exercising."


The first bit seems clear enough: they'll sail merrily on meddling in people's lives, and if their measures fail - as they will - they'll just step up the meddling. I can't wait to see the introduction of the eating ban, when people have to take their food out of the restaurant and eat it standing on the pavement, so that healthy diners aren't the victims of passive obesity. And then the pol's will act all surprised when restaurants start going out of business.

The bit about Mars Bars seems a bit off-piste. One Mars Bar has 281 calories. A normal male adult doing a desk job and next-to-no exercise (i.e. me) needs 2,000 calories a day. I bet I could eat two Mars Bars a day without getting fat, even if I stick to my strict little-or-no exercise regimen.

9 comments:

The Hickory Wind said...

In my personal experience... is not a good thing for a scientist to say. I run about five miles most mornings and I've found that I can more or less eat or drink what I like as long as I keep it up. Recently I've had too much work to be able to run as often as before and I've gained a few pounds. That's my personal experience. The 'exercise doesn't make you lose weight' thing always sounds to me like an excuse for the lazy. But I'm not a Professor of nutritional science.

Dick Puddlecote said...

Your calorie logic is lost on these people, they're only in it for the money.

I love the way they all, without fail, talk about big corporations destroying lives - when we choose to buy their products - yet the agenda of these people is to enrich themselves and destroy freedom of choice and basic liberties in the process.

The Hickory Wind said...

And the 'let's make food more expensive' line is also a cracker. All human progress throughout our history can be measured by how much cheaper it makes food. Everything else, leisure, sport, art, socialised medical care, a professional police force, everything that makes us happier, and gives us longer, more satisfactory lives, is a consequence of the cheapness of food. And this idiot, and many like him, want to make it more expensive.

Mark Wadsworth said...

CI, people are different, some people like exercise and good luck to them, it's a free world.

DP, I wasn't even doing logic, I was just doing facts. And Greggs is not a particularly big corporation - the really big corporations quite like all these bans and regulations and join in whole heartedly, see for example big tobacco and big booze like advertising bans because it saves them money and stops new entrants breaking into the market, and the big supermarket chains merrily join in with minimum pricing and all these food labelling reg's.

CI, another good point, but you fail to distinguish between Righteous food (which should be subsidised) and Unrighteous food which must be be banned, taxed, rationed etc.

Trooper Thompson said...

Hey guys, we need to get back to that anti-puritan cavalier thing that got floated a while back.

Mark Wadsworth said...

TT, these people can't make up their minds, on the one hand we're supposed to be all inclusive and we aren't allowed to make fun of people because that's a hate crime, but on the other hand, they merrily stoke up hatred against e.g. fatties. I mean, is it OK for me to insult fat people in the street to help persuade them to "turn their lives around" or would that be a hate crime?

Anonymous said...

I wish these dons would cultivate their own gardens rather than drive their tanks, uninvited,into mine.

Bayard said...

"The bit about Mars Bars seems a bit off-piste."

Come on Mark, don't be coy, the man is lying. What's more, he's transparently lying. Presumably he's lying because he doesn't want people to exercise more, he wants them to eat less. Perhaps he thinks over-eating is a sin. Who knows?
Don't forget rationing. The Neo-puritans haven't and they long to return to the days when people like them were able to control what people ate.

Trooper Thompson said...

Mark,

certainly not. The overweight are our potential new allies as the puritan fanatics get started on them, and they are in a more unfortunate situation, as they don't have the blitz-spirit camaraderie which smokers share.