Monday, 5 March 2012

"Thatcherite think-tank slams Housing Benefit cap plan"

From The Evening Standard:

Millions of Londoners in family homes would be unfairly penalised if George Osborne brings in a £400-a-week cap on Housing Benefit in this month’s Budget, a report claimed.

In a hard-hitting report, the Centre for Policy Studies (CPS), Margaret Thatcher’s favourite think tank, said widows, savers and people with large families would be losers under the policy. It said some three in ten households affected had been claiming Housing Benefit for family homes in London for a decade or more, opening up the claimants to the threat of deductions from their other benefit income based more on rising rental values than how well off they are.

“This strikes at the heart of the importance of aspiration and of property ownership,” said CPS director Tim Knox.

Warning that very wealthy landlords could sell their homes in the capital while breadwinners on relatively modest incomes would lose out, he added: “A Housing Benefit cap based on market rents is therefore a discouragement to aspiration. The probable result: brain drain and capital flight.”

7 comments:

Tim Almond said...

Warning that very wealthy landlords could sell their homes in the capital while breadwinners on relatively modest incomes would lose out, he added: “A Housing Benefit cap based on market rents is therefore a discouragement to aspiration. The probable result: brain drain and capital flight.”

What planet are these people on?

Do they really think that commodity brokers or advertising guys are living on housing benefit?

If you cap housing benefit, you'll INCREASE the number of brains. Drive out the people sat in Hammersmith that spend their days watching Jeremy Kyle and put them somewhere else in the country and the "brains" will move in.

If you're not going to bother to be economically active, then fine, get out of the way and go and live in a former Yorkshire mining town.

Mark Wadsworth said...

TS, I think the argument goes, if the landlords are 'forced' to sell their housing, there won't be any for the widows and orphans and squeezed middle to live in.

Bayard said...

"If you're not going to bother to be economically active, then fine, get out of the way and go and live in a former Yorkshire mining town."

Exactly. When I was made redundant in the 90s in London, I went back to the country, thinking "What's the point of living on the dole in expensive London, when you get the same amount in the country?"

However, uprooting people from their "communities" and getting them to live elsewhere is a big political no-no. A simple answer to the housing benefit problem is to tie HB to social housing rents. Got a large family? Fine, you get housing benefit equal to the rent you'd pay for a four-bed council or housing association house. The sort of landlords who rent to people on HB would soon bring their rents down as they began to run out of customers. It's not as if private tenants are going to snap up their overpriced properties.

Tim Almond said...

Bayard,

Actually, polling has shown that most people are in favour of moving people out of rich areas:-

"57% want those on housing benefit in expensive areas to be moved (29% disagree)."

I honestly don't understand the Tories. They act like Guardian readers matter, despite the fact that they are a tiny number and very few will ever vote Conservative.

Mark Wadsworth said...

B, correct. The point with London is that you can find much cheaper places by simply moving a few miles further away, half an hour by train.

TS, it was a spoof, having said waht you said (with which I wholeheartedly agree), now read the actual article and apply the same logic.

Bayard said...

"I honestly don't understand the Tories. They act like Guardian readers matter, despite the fact that they are a tiny number and very few will ever vote Conservative."

That's because the government are now simply the right wing of The New Socialist Party (with the Lib Dems as the centre and the parliamentary Labour Party as the left wing). True right-wing Tories and left-wing Labour have been consigned to the political wilderness for the forseeable future, along with libertarians, parliamentarians and anyone who is anti-statist.

Lola said...

Tragic really, because the CPS are capable of some sensible research. But thye still have that dreaded blind spot when it comes to housing...