Monday, 19 December 2011

We scrimped and save, I tell you! Scrimped and struggled and sacrificed and did home improvements!

Or alternatively, George Osbungle obliged with some new rail links at everyone else's expense. Spotted by Former Tory in The Daily Mail/This Is Money:

A select group of homeowners, househunters and developers will be feeling a little happier this week, thanks to Chancellor George Osborne.

For those who missed the Chancellor’s Autumn Statement on Tuesday, he announced 35 transport initiatives that will boost a number of locations: in particular North Cambridge, North Bucks/Oxfordshire and Battersea, South London. These rail and road schemes could be an important factor in choosing where to live, and might even bolster local house prices.

‘New or improved transport infrastructure can make a significant difference to the market, especially if it becomes easier to commute into a nearby city,’ says Grainne Gilmore, head of UK residential research at Knight Frank. ‘Ease of travel is high on any list of priorities for new buyers.’

Gilmore cites the opening of the Hindhead tunnel in Surrey in July this year as an example. Prices in key areas south of the tunnel, such as Grayshott and Haslemere, rose faster than surrounding areas in anticipation of the scheme, and Knight Frank forecast that they could outperform the general market by five per cent over the next year.


So that's one group of land owners who benefit at everybody else's expense, but sticking with the principle "They own land! Give them money!" no doubt the government will run a compensation scheme* to make sure that those people whose sites fall in value because they back onto a new railway without being near the station don't lose out.

* Disclaimer: The last house we bought backed onto a railway line, and houses on that side of the road were selling for about £15,000 less than the houses opposite (i.e. £95,000 against £110,000) which backed onto a little park with nice big trees in it, which belonging to the local school, was gated off and seldom used. The other thing that depressed the value of houses on my side was the fact that a motorway was being built on the other side of the railway, this had been clearly marked on local street maps for at least ten years, but the general route was announced circa 1960.

The motorway was duly finished and opened about two years after we bought the house. The motorway didn't make the blindest bit of difference of course, because we were already used to the much noisier railway, and the price we paid had already been reduced to account for this.

To our pleasant surprise, the Highways Agency then sent us a letter telling us that as the motorway noise affected our house, we were entitled to compensation of ten per cent of the current value of our house. Houses had shot up in value, so the HA sent us a nice cheque for £15,000. So we got a double-discount or our tax-free windfall capital gain to date was increased by a quarter, however you want to look at it. Complete and utter madness.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

"Complete and utter madness".

I believe that is indeed the title of the 4 volume "easily updateable" loose leaf ring binder type guide given during a secret ceremony and subject to a blood oath to "keep the contents secret" to each newly elected MP, and which sets out 'the one true way' for running the country .. a significant proportion of the "IT development" spending of government in the past 10 years has been devoted to producing the guide ina form which means it can be accessed via Facebook, held on a Kindle or similar device, accessed via Blackberry, I- phone etc. ..

Mark Wadsworth said...

Anon, do you any more excerpts from the great book of madness?

RS, it was a long time ago and I do. But it seemed more honest to mention the episode in the context of the post.

Anonymous said...

Aye Up - the estimable Mr Shapps has announced what some lucky souls will be getting from him (and it is damned decent of the fellow) as Xmas pressies

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/dec/22/council-housing-right-to-buy

and also in there some of the, these days, and I am being very generous to them here, standard "schizophrenia" from Shelter - as in "this is good, but it is also bad" ...

No mention of which particular orchard of magic money trees is going to be rigorously harvested to produce the cash to fund the shortfall between income from sales of existing stock at heavy discount and the amount required to build the superior no doubt replacement social housing that this cunning wheeze will deliver - it will be one new one for each existing one sold, Grant has promised !

Anonymous said...

And some telling lines in this tale of murder, ahem, tale of woe about what effect a murder has had on a properties "value" because, apart from the developers who purchased it from the murderer - and appear to have since just sat back and done, erm, bugger all - no one else wants to buy it 'because of its past'. Yeah right. Being such a cynic I'll bet the present agents for the sale have been finding it hard to wipe the grins off their faces at the splendid free plug the Wail has provided :-

"The imposing home’s notoriety meant it remained empty and crumbling, and on his release [in September 2007] Lumsden sold it to developers for £1.4 million."

"The house is on the market for ‘offers in excess of £2 million’. Built around the 1880s on the site of a former Roman Catholic boys’ school, it comes with two acres of land plus a derelict neighbouring house which could be demolished and replaced by two new properties.

A new owner would also have permission to knock down the orangery and extend the basement for an indoor heated swimming pool".

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2077528/Victorian-mansion-wants-buy-horrific-killing-2005.html

Anonymous said...

This is also "interesting" - well especially three quotes from it ...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2077528/Victorian-mansion-wants-buy-horrific-killing-2005.html

(1) "As a magnificent five-bedroom Victorian mansion in two acres of land, you would expect this family home to be snapped up for a premium as soon as it went on the market.

But now it lies deserted, with smashed or boarded-up windows, dozens of tyres piled up along one side and its lawns turned to scorched grass.

The macabre reason for its eerie state is that it has lain empty since its wealthy owner stabbed his wife to death in a frenzied attack in the master bedroom nearly seven years ago."

(2)"The imposing home’s notoriety meant it remained empty and crumbling, and on his release Lumsden [in September 2007] sold it to developers for £1.4million".

(3) "The house is on the market for ‘offers in excess of £2million’. Built around the 1880s on the site of a former Roman Catholic boys’ school, it comes with two acres of land plus a derelict neighbouring house which could be demolished and replaced by two new properties.

A new owner would also have permission to knock down the orangery and extend the basement for an indoor heated swimming pool."

Being a cynic I somehow think that the agents for the "developer" owners will find it difficult to suppress the ear to ear grins this ghastly publicity the Mail is providing have induced ..

Mark Wadsworth said...

Anon 20.52. As it happens, there is a magical money tree, it's called the rental value of land.

It costs £50k to build a unit of social housing, so in theory a council can sell off one unit of social housing for £100,000, buy up some farmland, award itself planning permission at zero cash cost and build two new ones.

Of course this won't happen, because the last thing they want is for the magical money tree to benefit the little guys, but hey...

Anon 23.36, that is a genius negotiating strategy for a developer. It's far more sophisticated than burning it down and risking criminal charges, and a lot quicker than leaving it to rot for twenty years so that it has to be demolished.

By the way, was the murderer only in prison for three or four years? FFS!