Having spent the last couple of days staring intently at women's elbows/waistlines, I announce this week's winner to be Sarah Jessica Parker (see poster for her latest film).
The narrowest part of her waist is three or four inches above her elbow line so she probably has incredibly long legs.
Ah... she does.
Was it all worth it?
2 hours ago
9 comments:
Mutant. Women's legs need to be two-thirds the length of their torsos.
Almost two thirds. Or for the pedants out there, 0.6180339887...
Having spent the last couple of days staring intently at women's elbows/waistlines,
I have spent the last few decades staring intently at women's breasts. I find it much more rewarding
JH, I don't know there was a rule.
CD, that's a tautology.
D, the Golden Rule.
PC, it's all in the same general sort of area, isn't it?
Still got a horses face.
AC1
Doesn't work for blokes though....
Narrowest part of my waist is my neck!
AC1, well yes, but interestingly, it was horse-faced Leona Lewis who was molested by a love sick horse.
Horse-faced SJP was attacked by a mere cow.
JP, maybe it doesn't, but I've no intention of finding out.
"Horse-faced SJP was attacked by a mere cow."
That article contains what has to be the most tortuous euphemism for sex I've come across - "I didn't make any demands in terms of the interpersonal connecting of body parts."
I've been trying to measure the elbow/waist length on those Scarlett Johansson pictures to test the theory, but keep getting distracted, so far the results are inconclusive and merit further study
Post a Comment