Spotted by Dick Puddlecote, this is brilliant.
These people are sort of thinking about campaigning against the badger cull, but they're not actually sure one way or another whose side they're on - cow or badger. They went on the safe side and called it the "No to badger campaign", which is delightfully ambiguous - is it the campaign which says "no" to badgers, or are they saying no to the "badger campaign" [i.e. cull]?
So please pop over to their Fun Online Poll and help them make up their minds.
Friday, 22 July 2011
Animal Victimhood Poker
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Good grief - you can hardly parody that lot.
But whichever side they decide all virtue lies on it will involve paying somebody. The purpose of government programmes is to pay government employees and their friends, the nominal purpose , whetehr to kill or protect badgers is secondary at best.
I don't know but assume this is a taxpayer funded fakecharity.
"38 Degrees brings you together with other people to take action on the issues that matter to you and bring about real change in the UK."
Life as a lefty seems so complicated, doesn't it?
It's obvious. They're against a harassment campaign.
Post a Comment