From The Telegraph:
Rocco Forte said increasing Air Passenger Duty by £1 per flight could recoup a significant proportion of what is now raised by VAT on hotel rooms, cutting costs for British holidaymakers and encouraging foreign travellers to stay longer once in Britain.
"Visitor numbers to Britain have fallen from 33 million to 29.5 million since 2007," Mr Forte said, in an interview with Telegraph Travel. "That represents around £2 billion in lost revenue each year, going by Visit Britain's own statistics, or roughly equivalent to what VAT on hotel rooms raises.
"I understand that the Government needs to raise tax, but VAT on hotel rooms has nothing to do with consumption as the rooms are there whether occupied or not – it's just a tax grab. A more sensible way of raising money would be increasing APD by £1. There are far more plane seats than hotel beds, and it would raise money, too. No one will notice £1 on top of their plane ticket, but £12 or more on top of the cost of a hotel room is putting off domestic and business travellers."
APD is also imposed by authorities in the United States, but is resisted by airlines here. "Any additional taxes on flying are unnecessary and ill-timed," said Michael O'Leary, who manages Ryan Air in Europe.
Friday, 3 June 2011
"Tax flights, not hotels, suggests Rocco Forte Hotels boss"
My latest blogpost: "Tax flights, not hotels, suggests Rocco Forte Hotels boss"Tweet this! Posted by Mark Wadsworth at 16:37
Labels: Air travel, Ryanair, Twats, VAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
All right, tax Guardian readers and Michael O'Leary.
D, an annual auction of airport landing slots is in the manifesto already (in place of APD and so on).
Ban taxes and fuel surcharges, or force airlines to include them with the main fare. In Sainsbury's I earn nectar points on my VAT, so why can't I use my air miles to pay the taxes? The taxes and surcharges are usually nearly half of the whole fare anyway, so a "reward" flight ends up being about 50% off...
On the other hand, why do all the airlines love Heathrow so much? Most people need a visa just to change planes in Heathrow, which costs like £100 even if they never leave the airport. If they schedule a hotel stay it costs more but then nobody knows if they actually got on their second flight as the UKBA doesn't check who leaves the country. Go to Paris or Amsterdam or Frankfurt where visas are not required for transfer and the taxes are slightly lower. If the fares are higher then something is wrong.
"VAT on hotel rooms has nothing to do with consumption as the rooms are there whether occupied or not – it's just a tax grab". I must use that argument at check in at one of his hotels when I demand an upgrade to the Presidential Suite. "It would only be empty otherwise. It's therefore not consumption so I shouldn't be charged for it."
What Forte should do is argue the green angle. "We plant one tree and one wind farm next to Michael O'Leary's house for every room night."
OTOH, it was a spoof article, now read the original!
Post a Comment