From The British Medical Journal via Tobacco Analysis Blog via Freedom 2 Choose via Leg Iron:
Conclusions Available trials indicate that nicotine replacement therapy is an effective intervention in achieving sustained smoking abstinence for smokers who have no intention or are unable to attempt an abrupt quit. Most of the evidence, however, comes from trials with regular behavioural support and monitoring and it is unclear whether using nicotine replacement therapy without regular contact would be as effective.
[Skip a bit]
The results imply that compared with placebo twice* the number of smokers sustained six months’ abstinence as a result of nicotine replacement therapy. This equates to about an additional 3% of all smokers quitting who would otherwise not have done so**.
This is a similar effect size to treating smokers who are motivated to quit, where 4-5% might be expected to abstain for six months owing to use of nicotine replacement therapy. Previous data suggest that half of those who sustain six months of abstinence will maintain it for the rest of their lives.***
* The relative success compared to the placebo group is only of interest in deciding whether the treatment itself has any effect at all, and not whether that makes the treatment worthwhile. The use of the word "twice" suggests that nicotine replacement therapy is highly effective, but "twice" could mean that 0.1% of all smokers quit and 0.2% of all people using nicotine replacement therapy quite, for example.
** Of course that doesn't mean that 3% of smokers quit, it means that 3% more quit. Let's assume that five per cent of smokers quit for good every year x ten million smokers in the UK = 500,000 quitters. If the number of quitters goes up by 3%, then 515,000 smokers quit, those extra 15,000 quitters are only 0.15% of all smokers, for example.
*** But they tell us that only 2% or 3% of smokers who are "motivated to quit' actually quit long term. So out of ten million smokers in the UK, 250,000 give up permanently, so 3% x 250,000 = 7,500 = an additional 0.075%, call it a tenth of a per cent in round figures.
It appears that the NHS spends £74 million a year on stop smoking services. £74 million divided by those extra 7,500 quitters = nearly £10,000 per quitter.
The economics of the bung
11 minutes ago
4 comments:
I think "This equates to about an additional 3% of all smokers quitting who would otherwise not have done so" means that 3% quit without the therapy and an additional 3%, total 6%, quit with it.
But their overall 'success' rates are in the order of 2% or 3%; nowhere near 6%. Unless of course no smoker would otherwise ever quit at all (which we also know not to be true).
Oh, that *is* interesting.
I confess: I gave up smoking via a nicotine replacement nasal spray, happily prescribed to me for a year by my GP (free really as I have an annual pre-payment whatsit for other troubles). In the absence of e-fags, I honestly don't think I'd have managed, having had several failed attempts previously. I wanted the crack-like instant hit provided by the spray, y'see.
I paid for my own Fisherman's Friends to get me off the spray though!
So that makes me 2%?
I had a boss who wanted to give up smoking, so he started with the patches. He still had the craving, so he started chewing the gum, as well. That was still not enough, so he would smoke the odd cigar. Finally he caved in and went back to the cigarettes, but kept on with the patches and the gum! I can't remember how he got out of that - perhaps he didn't.
Post a Comment