The BBC serves up a veritable feast of should, could, is often, may, at risk, most likely, researchers, experts, at risk, potential harm and related to.
There doesn't seem to be a single hard fact (i.e. any fact falling into Class C or above) in the whole article.
Scotland: a Humza Yousaf retrospective, part 2
6 hours ago
1 comments:
Possibly what they mean is:
"Regardless of any harm caused, all high/relaxation inducing substances are illegal unless your morally-posturing government agencies get a large slice of the action, in which case they will only harass and persecute you."
Makes their approach a bit transparent, though, which is why they've always gone for the salami tactics.
Post a Comment