Tuesday, 4 May 2010

Italy shows us how it's done

From the BBC:

A woman visiting a post office in Novara, north-western Italy, has been stopped by police for wearing an Islamic veil covering her face. A police official told the AFP news agency the woman would have to pay a 500-euro (£430) fine.

It is the first such police action since Novara brought in a by-law in January banning clothing preventing immediate identification in public...

Novara Mayor Massimo Giordano said the by-law was meant to deter women from covering themselves with the veil in public. "But unfortunately it is apparently not yet clear to everyone that clothes preventing the wearer's identification can be tolerated at home but not in public places, in schools, on buses or in post offices," he said, according to the Italian state news agency Ansa. "There are still some people that refuse to understand that our community in Novara does not accept and does not want people going around wearing the burka."

He said the by-law was "the only tool at our disposal to stop behaviour that makes the already difficult process of integration even harder"...

Italy has, since 1975, had a national anti-terrorism law which forbids any mask or clothing that makes it impossible to identify the wearer. However, the law permits exceptions for "justified cause", which has often been interpreted by courts as including religious reasons for wearing a veil, Ansa reports...

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

With the result that Muslim women will no longer be allowed out of the house. Nice one.

James Higham said...

I really do believe things are starting to turn our way. There've been some positives lately.

Mark Wadsworth said...

Anon, excuse me, who exactly is not letting them out of the house? Has any Western party ever suggested that wives of fundamentalist Islamists not be allowed out of the house?

JH, Belgium, Italy, France... Sooner or later, UKIP will be more in step with 'Europe' than even the Lib Dems.

Anonymous said...

shame the legislation couldn't have been used earlier to keep the mask wearing wacko jacko indoors. He was a seriously irritating fundamentalist

Tim Almond said...

The number 1 thing is making sure that businesses can ban people wearing burqas as a security risk (and that UK customs can insist on a photograph) in the same way that they do with banning people wearing motorcycle helmets.

Completely liberal and would probably have the same effect as a ban because leaving the house would become a pointless exercise.

Incidentally, we should also address the exception for sikhs where they don't have to wear a hard hat on a construction site or a helmet on a motorcycle. If the purpose of the law is safety then an exemption because of a bit of cloth is an ass. If sikhs can choose not to wear a helmet, then anyone else should be able to.

Anonymous said...

@Mark Wadsworth "Anon, excuse me, who exactly is not letting them out of the house?"

Their husbands.

Same story but the husband says that if she can't wear the burka, she wont be allowed out of the house.

Anonymous said...

agreed -

MW: who exactly is preventing them from leaving the house is irrelevant. If it is against their will they need help, not hounding.

Mark Wadsworth said...

Anon, I know perfectly well what you are driving at. You say they need "help" but from whom? There are laws against kidnap and imprisonment, you know, so if the wives aren't happy being treated like chattels, they don't have to put up with it.