Interestingly, Northern Ireland never replaced Domestic Rates with Poll Tax or Council Tax. The old valuations had got a bit out of date, so they revalued all residential properties as at 1 January 2005 and then calculated the rate required to raise the same amount of tax, which happened to be 0.78% per annum (plus local precept, where applicable) on the updated capital values.
They cap the value per property at £400,000, so the biggest annual bill you can have is £3,120 (plus local precept if applicable). That, taken in isolation, was a daft thing to do, but I suppose it's only fair as they still have Stamp Duty Land Tax and Inheritance Tax, which are jealousy surcharges on properties worth more than £250,000 (3% band) or £500,000 (4% band) or estates worth more than £325,000 (40%).
That strikes me as a lot fairer than Council Tax in the rest of the UK, which is in 8 bands (annual bills between £850 and £2,550) so it is less regressive, i.e. does not have a Poll Tax element.
Further, if it were up to me, I'd get rid of SDLT and IHT as well and get rid of the £400,000 cap. I suspect that this would be a modest net benefit to people in homes valued at more than £400,000, i.e. would you rather pay lots of 0.78% instalments or have your heirs pay one big 44% or 43% chunk when you die? Either way, it keeps things nice and simple and enables us to shut down the departments at HMRC dealing with SDLT and IHT.
Sunday, 21 March 2010
Northern Ireland
My latest blogpost: Northern IrelandTweet this! Posted by Mark Wadsworth at 11:37
Labels: Commonsense, Council Tax, Domestic Rates, Northern Ireland
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I don't have anything to add to this post, I just think it's excellent, and you don't have one of those poncy new blog templates that allows people to click 'like this'.
JB, ta. I did add a 'Tweet this' though :(
"enables us to shut down the departments at HMRC dealing with SDLT and IHT": you naif, starry-eyed optimist, you.
D, that's the beauty of property taxes. Apart from being the economically least damaging taxes, they are the very opposite of stealth taxes; people know what they are paying and object violently (but irrationally) to every penny (unlike true stealth taxes like VAT or National Insurance, which are very economically damaging but people don't seem to care).
So the only way a government could push through a £1 increase in property taxes is by demonstrably cutting other taxes by at least £2.
Post a Comment