** Please note: I am not Mark Wadsworth **
Here comes a plan by the government to make use of all the pubs that they've put out of business with the smoking ban:-
The venture, which has financial backing from the Home Office, could see games, music, entertainment and food served up to their 13 to 19-year-old patrons - but nothing stronger than a cola for refreshment.Of course they're interested. If you're running a business and not interested when the government come knocking then you probably should be doing something else. These pub companies could end up making more money than they ever did as pubs.
Three major pub companies are interested in the venture, with the first pilots expected to open in Crewe and Merseyside within the next three months, which if successful could lead to a national roll-out.
The initiative has already received policy support from Government departments including the Home Office, which has agreed to fund early work on one of the first projects.How? Chances are that all they'll do is to encourage kids to just bring their own vodka (bought from a local shop) into the bar to mix it with the subsidised cokes. Or take an e before they go in.
Partnership Projects managing director Andrew Harris, which is behind the pilots, said alcohol-free teen-pubs could help reduce crime, address substance misuse and encourage future adults to drink responsibly.
He said: 'We have done a tremendous amount of research into the concept of a teenage pub including polling youngsters themselves about what they wanted from these new outlets.Adults want soft drinks? WTF? What adults have you been asking? Methodists?
'Basically they are looking for the same services as adults, which means entertainment, games, music, soft drinks and convenience food.'
The new pubs will offer the same services as any traditional public house business except for alcohol and gambling.So, they won't be anything like a traditional public house, then.
Each pub will be run by a local 'not-for-profit company' that will comprise local agencies helped by a shadow board of teenagers.Yeah, sure they will. There isn't a single example of government spending money on something that then resulted in self-financing after. Within a few years (at best), they're back for more. Mostly because government is hopeless at considering things like maintenance costs into the cost of providing a service. Over time, things get steadily worse and worse and eventually the project needs a massive extra chunk of spending.
It is hoped funding will help meet start-up and first-year running costs, which will total up to £60,000 for each venue. The pubs are expected to become self-financing after the first year of operations.
You're going to put "local agency" types in charge of entertainment and expect them to do anything as good as break even after year 1? These were the left-wing wankers put in charge of the entertainment at the Dome and dozens of lottery-funded museums across the country, all of which lost money by the bucketload.
These are people with no experience of running anything in the commercial sector. You think these sorts are going to come round from the other side of the bar, break up a fight and ban the kids? You think they're going to fire barmaids who are chatting to each other rather than serving customers? You think they're going to nail down suppliers to give them a better price on food when they have no financial incentive to do so?
Give it 2 or 3 years and these places will be a disaster. Sadly, that will probably be too late for some pilot reports which massage various statistics to make them seem like a jolly good idea.
Dealing with kids causing trouble starts with parents, and that means getting parents to take responsibility for their kids, and that probably isn't helped by a welfare state which means they don't have to be. Get rid of most of it and you'll sort out crime.
Alcohol abuse? There's a real simple answer to that, and it doesn't take lots of pointless government programmes. Just get the police and courts to actually enforce the licensing laws, and start being much harder on licensees who sell to kids under 18.
10 comments:
they are looking for the same services as adults, which means ...soft drinks and convenience food.Given that the Food police are only two pages behind the Smoking police, in the manual, I wonder how long these places will manage to offer soft drink and convenience foods without criticism. Perhaps if they went directly for locally sourced Organic fruit juices, and Organic vegetarian meals they could avoid having to change next year.
OC, I've taken the liberty of adding a link to the 'Partnership Projects' homepage.
Read it and puke.
Where there is any gathering of youth there will be eager recruiters - drug dealers ,religious fanatics etc.
"There isn't a single example of government spending money on something that then resulted in self-financing after. "
Wasn't there a case in the US where (due to the owner defaulting on his taxes, or something) the federal government ended up the de facto owner of a legal brothel, and the management they put in failing to turn a profit?
Leading people to point out that if the government couldn't manage to turn a profit in the age-old business of selling pussy and booze, well.... ;)
Would UKIP overturn the smoking ban? I've heard various people on blogs saying that whatever happens the smoking ban is here to stay and I think that would be a shame. I've no objection to individual, privattely owned businesses banning smoking from their establishments, but I do believe that it should be a choice for that business and not a diktat from government. I'm not a smoker (apart from the very rare cigar), but my personal experience suggests that banning smoking has killed the traditional pub. Some are doing very well - but generally these are either gastro pubs or drinking warehouses. Real pubs are struggling to survive and may become extinct. That would be a real shame.
Stan, UKIP's policy is that pubs should have separate smoking and no-smoking areas, which is a good start.
This is the equivalent of bringing ibn regulations to prevent housebuilding/drive up the prices to 4 times what they were & then give billions to councillor's friends, calling themselves housing associations, to build more crappy houses.
Well maybe not quite equivalent - requiring them to be pubs with no beer is a bit like requiring new houses to be built without roofs.
"Adults want soft drinks? WTF? What adults have you been asking? Methodists?"
You mock but a lot of people drink soft drinks in pubs. I regularly go to a pub quiz night with friends and at the end of the evening the table is covered with empty coffee cups, and soft drinks glasses. And I believe Wetherspoons serve more tea and coffee than any other drink, making them one of the largest coffee chains in the country. And profit margins are much greater on soft drinks, and tea and coffee, so I would have thought the pub chains would be very interested.
S, your comment on Wetherspoons is I believe correct, but your anecdotal evidence might just be a sign that bar staff are more concerned with collecting, washing and refilling the beer and wine glasses, whereas a coffee cup would only be used once or twice per evening.
A beer drinker might drink five or ten pints an evening, but somebody on Coke might only drink one or two glasses thereof.
They should leave the dispensing machines in the bathrooms.
Post a Comment