From the FT:
Featherbedding the owner-occupier
Sir, Mr and Mrs Bellemaison gambled on the property market ("Brown throws homeowners a mortgage lifeline", December 4). Mr Bellemaison loses his job and has to accept a lower-paid one. The state steps in and subsidises their interest payments.
Next door, Mr and Mrs Prudence are tenants. Mr Prudence also loses his job and has to accept a lower paid one. The state does not step in to subsidise their rent*. The Prudences are forced to move to a lower-rent property.
Why the difference in treatment?
Yugo Kovah, Twichenham, Middlesex.
Lex on the back page summarises the madness of this in more depth.
* Unless Mr Prudence fails to find a new job, of course, in which case they can claim Housing & Council Tax Benefit.
Christmas Day: readings for Year C
9 hours ago
1 comments:
A very valid argument. Brown is playing to the middle classes who have deserted Labour in such huge numbers. There is nothing economically or socially rational about this plan.
Post a Comment