A couple of posts ago, I ran through the list of the gummint's first six reckless attempts to prop up house prices. As we can see, as each attempt fails, they try something bigger and stupider, culminating in the taxpayer funded £50 billion (or £500 billion, depending how you interpret it) bank bail out and 0.5% base rate cut yesterday.
JackC over at HPC asked:
@mark wadsworth "each new throw of the dice is more reckless than the previous one" - is the latest measure introduced yesterday the last thow of the dice (in your opinion?).
I for one doubt very much that it is, so here's my list of things that the major parties have seriously considered (and might yet implement), all with an eye to propping up house prices, which is of course impossible:
- giving FTB's grants towards their first home;
- buying up empty properties;
- giving more money to Housing Associations;
- paying the mortgages of people who lose their jobs;
- reintroducing MIRAS;
- putting a cap on Council Tax;
- increasing SDLT nil rate from £175,000, scrapping it altogether or exempting FTB's;
- exempting main residence from Inheritance Tax;
- replacing Council Tax with Local Income Tax;
I am sure that there are dozens of others that I may have missed, if you think of any more, please leave a comment.
Elevate their cause?
3 hours ago
3 comments:
There was a scheme to buy up properties and demolish them. Although rather bizarrely this was implemented before the house price crash.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3724/is_/ai_n17191247
"Paying the mortgages of people who lose their jobs;"
You get a tick in the 'done box' for this one.
The Times (9 Oct)
James Purnell, the Work and Pensions Secretary, will reiterate plans at a Jobcentre Plus conference today for the recently unemployed to have the interest paid on their mortgages. Under the present Income Support for Mortgage Interest scheme, the value of homes eligible is £100,000. This will be increased to £175,000. The waiting period for the scheme will also be decreased from 39 to 12 weeks.
You're right though... there is much more to come yet. We're well passed the point where a confidence boosting measure is sufficient.
I guess I should have thought of this sooner, but forcing banks to carry on lending was always going to be one possible strategy, even if they don't want to lend.
Post a Comment