They obviously come from Planet Zog.
Having shamelessly rewritten the statistics to quadruple the number of alcohol related NHS admissions, they now throw this crap on the table:
The £25 billion bill is made up of NHS costs of £2.7 billion, crime costs of up to £15 billion and loss of productivity of up to £7.3 billion, the Department of Health report said.
The NHS £2.7 billion I have already covered. £15 billion for crime breaks down into shoplifting (see below) and fights outside pubs (which I covered here). And that loss of productivity is not a loss to the economy; a hangover is part of each person's cost of drinking in the evening (covered here)*.
Here's the gummint's killler proposal:
The report suggested ... off-licences be prevented from displaying alcohol near check-outs.
*sigh*
Sensibly run shops always have Highly Nickable Items (small, tempting and/or high value) either: at the counter (sweets, batteries, condoms); behind the counter (cigarettes, spirits); or within eyeshot thereof (the fridge for lager and cider); or on the top shelf (porn mags are very expensive and exactly the sort of thing that teenagers want to steal - this is not just prudishness).
So if we implemented this proposal, the cost of crime (and the amount of under-age drinking) would go up; or have they already borne this Unintended Consequence in mind - if half your alcohol is being stolen, you'd stop stocking it?
* In the same way as not doing overtime is part of the cost of leisuretime.
Wednesday, 23 July 2008
"£25 billion spent on alcohol abuse"
My latest blogpost: "£25 billion spent on alcohol abuse"Tweet this! Posted by Mark Wadsworth at 10:11
Labels: Alcohol, Bansturbation, Bastards, Commonsense, crime, Fuckwits, Licence fees, Pubs, Unintended conseqences
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
or have they already borne this Unintended Consequence in mind
I think it more likely that whoever thought up this ridiculous proposal is as stupid as they imagine the general public to be.
"have they already borne this Unintended Consequence in mind"
If they did, it'd be a first!
I like your point about leisure vs overtime. Maximising economic productivity is not our objective, maximising human happiness is. Often one equals the other but not always. The government once again forgets that it's dealing with people and not work modules that can be readily programmed.
K & M, great minds think ...
Government could always scrap the Education Maintenance Allowance that gives "disadvantaged" teenagers £30 per week beer money!
Don't forget all the doctors, nurses, street cleaners and Police officers who are employed because of alcohol's blight either!
Post a Comment