From the BBC:
Transport Secretary Chris Grayling said:
"Our new aviation strategy will look beyond the new runway at Heathrow and sets [sic] out a comprehensive long-term plan for UK aviation. It will support jobs and economic growth across the whole of the UK. Our vision puts the passenger at the heart of what we do, but also recognises the need to address the impacts of aviation on communities and the environment."
None of that has any tangible meaning whatsoever, it's the usual kitchen sink random list bollocks.
An actual expert gets to down to brass tacks:
Martin Rolfe, chief executive of NATS, said the consultation process could take between two and three years, "so millions and millions of people will have a say in aircraft flying over their house".
He told the BBC's Today programme: "Local communities are very obviously concerned about what more traffic might look like, but actually modernising [airspace] means we can keep aircraft higher for longer. "We can have them descend more steeply than they currently do because modern aircraft are more capable than the types of aircraft that were in service when this airspace was originally designed."
I'll mark him down for using the meaningless phrase "local communities" instead of just "people", but hey.
Crowds and Warnings
1 hour ago
2 comments:
Remove a few words and it becomes a standard template:
"Our new < insert name of subject here > strategy will look beyond the < insert name of subject here > and will set out a comprehensive long-term plan for < insert name of subject here >. It will support jobs and economic growth across the whole of the UK. Our vision puts the customer at the heart of what we do, but also recognises the need to address the impacts of < insert name of subject here > on communities and the environment."
Works for HS2, steelmaking, coal mining etc.
B, exactly 😀
Post a Comment