Mark Wadsworth: Propaganda Fail

Wednesday, 7 December 2016

Propaganda Fail

10 comments:

Mark Wadsworth said...: I'm a bit baffled. Is that the cost of panels before or after subsidies?; 8 December 2016 at 18:19
benj said...: regarding subsidies, I don't know. Does it matter?; 8 December 2016 at 23:03
Bayard said...: I'm baffled too, where's the failure?; 9 December 2016 at 08:46
George Carty said...: Is it the "Decrease in prices -74%" (ie the double-negative)?; 9 December 2016 at 09:57
benj said...: 'Cos prices haven't kept falling. They leveled off after 2012. Duh!; 9 December 2016 at 12:59
Mark Wadsworth said...: BJ good one!; 9 December 2016 at 13:25
Bayard said...: BJ, that doesn't mean to say they are not still falling. Ask any Global Warmmonger.; 9 December 2016 at 13:42
paulc156 said...: Badly worded. The heading on the chart has it right. That said prices bid in tendering for new solar generation in Germany is at record lows this autumn. Below 0.07 euro p/kwh. So prices at source if not at system level continue to fall.; 10 December 2016 at 11:34
benj said...: @ P

"Badly worded. The heading on the chart has it right."

Thats right, because level is the same as falling. I see that now, so not a propaganda fail but a success. God bless the sheeple!; 10 December 2016 at 12:02
paulc156 said...: BJ. Clearly,'solar prices keep falling' on 'that' chart is wrong. That looks like a tweet? On the chart itself is the heading 'solar prices down since 2006 by 74%', which is correct. Mind you, the guy who tweeted the misleading comment above the chart could be excused seeing as no one here spotted the error until you pointed it out.; 10 December 2016 at 16:21

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)