Saturday, 21 February 2015

Leeches on the back of leeches on the back of leeches...

A couple of years ago there was a marked increase in the number of doormen outside pubs etc. in central London, all of whom have a fancy little licence thingy displayed on their arm.

I got chatting to one yesterday (who does it part time while doing a BA in management) and between us we pieced together the sequence of events…

1. After the riots of 2011, a lot of insurance companies found a brilliant excuse for not paying out claims, which was that the shop involved did not have sufficient security guards, and this was written into later insurance policies. (As an aside, the guard reckoned that far too many shopkeepers were robbing their own shops and then claiming for missing goods, not sure what difference it would make).

2. So all the shops and pubs had to hire security guards, and the 'industry' boomed.

3. The government got in on the act and set up the Security Industry Authority to regulate things.

4. To be able to work as a security guard, you have to go and do the accreditation course, which takes a week or two and which costs you £300 to £400. Most employers don't reimburse this.

5. So then we get a load of private businesses providing these courses e.g. here, the guard I was talking to couldn't actually remember learning very much, but you need to do it to be able to get the job to keep the government and the insurance companies happy.

The fact that while paying a couple of security guards to hover at the doors of your shop or pub during opening hours might deter normal shoplifting or general rowdiness, it wouldn't make the blindest bit of difference if masses of people raid the premises after closing time when they are not on duty and would be completely overwhelmed anyway was not lost on either of us.

7 comments:

Lola said...

Regulationism creates its own inflation. See FCA for how to do it best.

A K Haart said...

That's a good title - officialdom is riddled with leeches on leeches on...

Almost anything is grist to the mill.

Mark Wadsworth said...

L, yup.

AKH, I am not entirely innocent in all this e.g. I am a tax advisor whose clients have included a recruitment agency which specialised in estate agents and letting agents.

Lola said...

MW. You work for whom? Now that IS funny...

Rich Tee said...

The central government agency may be new, but bouncers have worn official ID and have been required to go on training courses in Leeds for about 20 years now.

The north of England does still lead the way in some industries LOL.

Mark Wadsworth said...

L, most of my clients are proper businesses, that one was an extreme outlier in rent-seeking-ness.

RT, now that is interesting. Perhaps I just never noticed the licences down here?

Bayard said...

I once had a communist lodger who said I was a "parasite squared", i.e. a parasite on a parasite, I suppose. Apparently that was what Lenin called landlords.