From a reader's letter in the FT:
Lehman Brothers senior secured debt is currently trading at about 15 per cent of its face value, indicating that the bondholders are likely to lose 85 per cent of their investment. This indicates that those ranked below the senior bondholders, including equity holders, will lose everything.
However, Lehman Brothers equity, which is traded on the over-the-counter market, is currently trading at 15 cents, which indicates that equity traders believe that after all outstanding claims are paid off there will be cash remaining for the equity holders.
As the reader points out, "the price is not always right": the people trading in shares are considerably more optimistic about the outcome of the liquidation than those trading in the bonds. The first group assumes that enough assets will be recovered so that bonds will be repaid in full and the second group assumes that they won't. Although both may be making a reasonable guess, they can't both be right.
So, assuming that the facts as stated in the letter are correct, what's the arbitrage opportunity? Click and highlight to reveal:
Sell the shares short at 15 cents and buy the bonds at 15 cents.
The first 100 cents that the liquidator collects will be used to redeem your bonds. If he collects less than 15 cents, you lose on the bonds but win a larger amount on the short sale as the shares will fall to nil. The next 85 cents are used to redeem the bonds, reaping you a potential 85 cent profit on the bonds and a 15 cent profit on the short sale.
If the liquidator collects more than 115 cents, then you start losing money on your short sale, but he would have to collect 200 cents before you actually make a loss overall, which is at least fifteen times as much as the markets are expecting so this would seem highly unlikely.
Crowds and Warnings
1 hour ago
4 comments:
Now how would the average jo have known that, Mark? You need to be an accountant.
a pedant writes
I know exactly what you mean, and there's an opportunity for sure; but it's not a true arb, Mark, it's not risk-free (even below 200 cents)
even if there were exactly the same number of bonds as shares (I assume not, it would be a remarkable coincidence)
- there is all manner of political/legal/regulatory risk
- market-for-shares is not the same as market-for-bonds, and may not behave in correlated (or inversely correlated) ways
- shares rarely go to zero - even Enron shares still traded OTC during the interminable winding-up period
ND, agreed to all that.
There is a whole range of possible outcomes with a probability assigned to each one, so it is mathematically possible that, ex ante, the bonds and shares are correctly priced (if there's a 90% probability of 15 cents being recovered and a 10% probability of 200 cents being recovered, for example).
Ex post is a different matter, at least one of the two prices will turn out to be wildly, stupendously wrong.
it's more a hedge-fund type play, isn't it ?
I've been watching RBS prefs rather closely for months - there have been several opportunities there too
Post a Comment