tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1141932539860553199.post8996575900565065592..comments2024-03-05T10:52:24.691+00:00Comments on Mark Wadsworth: More fun with Poor Widows In Mansions (there are hardly any)Mark Wadsworthhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07733511175178098449noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1141932539860553199.post-80390374581625219142014-07-03T21:16:27.608+01:002014-07-03T21:16:27.608+01:00L, I have emailed.
B, good questions, the answer...L, I have emailed. <br /><br />B, good questions, the answers are "some" and "practically none". In the grander scheme of things, as you always say, there are no PWIMs, and the few who exist can roll up and defer. Sorted.Mark Wadsworthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07733511175178098449noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1141932539860553199.post-82896671528351551702014-07-03T20:28:30.653+01:002014-07-03T20:28:30.653+01:00"1 per cent of households with incomes in the..."1 per cent of households with incomes in the bottom 40 per cent had property wealth of more than £500,000."<br /><br />How many of those are not actually PWIMS in their family home, but people of working age who are in a house to which they have no particular ties or who are capable of earning more should they so wish? <br /><br />Also, how many of this 1% are going to be in a house worth £2M or more? Probably none.Bayardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15211150959757982948noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1141932539860553199.post-74204329525624432852014-07-03T17:01:20.416+01:002014-07-03T17:01:20.416+01:00"And "land" is not really net wealt...<i>"And "land" is not really net wealth in itself, it is a measure of the flow of income or benefits from non-landowners to landowners"</i> Would you like to expand on that?Lolahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04586735342675041312noreply@blogger.com