tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1141932539860553199.post3667477340208050490..comments2024-03-05T10:52:24.691+00:00Comments on Mark Wadsworth: More Climate Change BollocksMark Wadsworthhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07733511175178098449noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1141932539860553199.post-51240083062278490182020-06-04T14:50:43.120+01:002020-06-04T14:50:43.120+01:00G, it was interesting to observe how the air tempe...G, it was interesting to observe how the air temperature plummeted once the weather became cloudy, but the Alarmists were too busy preaching that we're all going to fry to point that out, which would have neatly answered the objection, "Why are clear skies a good thing if they mean more sunshine?". OTOH, they would then have to explain where all the heat was going or perhaps they could have just hand-waved that away, as Mark says in the post above about the lack of the "greenhouse effect" on Mars, "because...reasons".Bayardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15211150959757982948noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1141932539860553199.post-86180358589049513502020-06-04T13:43:07.812+01:002020-06-04T13:43:07.812+01:00I find it interesting that they say "sunniest...I find it interesting that they say "sunniest". That means it cannot be the hottest, wettest, driest or coldest so, to be able to use a superlative they go for sunniest. Which is meaningless. If it is sunniest then why is it not the hottest? Where else does the heat come from? Since CO2 levels are steadily climbing, why isn't the sunniness being trapped in the atmosphere?Graemehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11007306140530173428noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1141932539860553199.post-81401065331979701342020-06-03T20:34:09.647+01:002020-06-03T20:34:09.647+01:00OTOH, thatnks for that snippet, which was what I s...OTOH, thatnks for that snippet, which was what I sort of suspected from the Beeb, which is why I mentioned the polar bear picture.Bayardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15211150959757982948noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1141932539860553199.post-91353558936673579612020-06-03T16:28:43.658+01:002020-06-03T16:28:43.658+01:00MW. Until the Triffids hatch I'm not going to...MW. Until the Triffids hatch I'm not going to worry about that.Lolahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04586735342675041312noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1141932539860553199.post-77204054438453782282020-06-03T12:56:43.628+01:002020-06-03T12:56:43.628+01:00OTOH, I'm glad to hear that. There's been ...OTOH, I'm glad to hear that. There's been hardly any rain for two months, but at least the reservoirs are still 85% full.Mark Wadsworthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07733511175178098449noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1141932539860553199.post-26873913089330393512020-06-03T12:17:27.801+01:002020-06-03T12:17:27.801+01:00That story starts with a picture of a reservoir wi...That story starts with a picture of a reservoir with low water levels, which is then not referenced in the story. It's the kind of hinting-without-saying that the BBC often uses. It is a story about climate change, and they are implying that we are short of water because of climate change, whereas their story a couple of days earlier says that reservoirs are 85% full, and that it is a matter of unprecedented demand and not being able to treat the water fast enough<br /><br />https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-52875417 ontheotherhandhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08912527435489023299noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1141932539860553199.post-82880210361353451192020-06-03T11:51:30.242+01:002020-06-03T11:51:30.242+01:00L, the plants won't thank you.L, the plants won't thank you.Mark Wadsworthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07733511175178098449noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1141932539860553199.post-17344401883244063022020-06-03T11:17:32.931+01:002020-06-03T11:17:32.931+01:00MW. So if we start taking CO2 out of the atmospher...MW. So if we start taking CO2 out of the atmosphere to synthesise petrol that'll be a Good Thing then?Lolahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04586735342675041312noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1141932539860553199.post-41814367526166014542020-06-03T09:47:50.606+01:002020-06-03T09:47:50.606+01:00... and in fairness to the MMGW crowd, it is not d...... and in fairness to the MMGW crowd, it is not daily emission levels that would change temperatures, it is the total amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, which is still climbing slowly but steadily.Mark Wadsworthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07733511175178098449noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1141932539860553199.post-37141662806244215642020-06-02T23:41:10.995+01:002020-06-02T23:41:10.995+01:00What this actually illustrates is that fewer aerop...What this actually illustrates is that fewer aeroplanes = fewer high clouds. <br /><br />Fewer high clouds = less sun light reflected in the day time = more sun = higher day time temperatures.<br /><br />The flip side is, it gets a lot colder at night. But overall, a bit warmer.<br /><br />So if you want to "save the planet" and prevent "catastrophic global heating", just get the skies full of aeroplanes again!!Mark Wadsworthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07733511175178098449noreply@blogger.com